The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Artice created by a by a banned sockpuppet in violation of topic ban: the article is about politically-driven news-site. Also nonnotable subject. Independent sources cited are only for various facts not directly about Euromaidan Press, i.e., despite numerous footnotes, it is one big
WP:SYNTH.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
01:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Sorry, exactly opposite: From the link cited: "I opened my own website, Euromaidan Press, to tell the story of what was happening." -- how this supposed to satisfy GNG?
Staszek Lem (
talk)
17:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Sockpuppetry is a behavioural matter, not a reason for deletion; executing your proposed deletion would be an act of punishment, and we are above that. Moreover, the references unarguably support the topic. --
pmj (
talk)
05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, when looking for news about Ukraine online I come across "Euromaidan Press" a lot. It is good to have a Wikipedia article that tells the background of this organisation. It is good that people can find out on an indipendent platform, Wikipedia, that "Euromaidan Press" was set up by
Euromaidan-supporting people and not by
Russian trolls. Article is also well sourced. — Yulia Romero •
Talk to me!12:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Artice created by a by a banned sockpuppet in violation of topic ban: the article is about politically-driven news-site. Also nonnotable subject. Independent sources cited are only for various facts not directly about Euromaidan Press, i.e., despite numerous footnotes, it is one big
WP:SYNTH.
Staszek Lem (
talk)
01:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Sorry, exactly opposite: From the link cited: "I opened my own website, Euromaidan Press, to tell the story of what was happening." -- how this supposed to satisfy GNG?
Staszek Lem (
talk)
17:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Sockpuppetry is a behavioural matter, not a reason for deletion; executing your proposed deletion would be an act of punishment, and we are above that. Moreover, the references unarguably support the topic. --
pmj (
talk)
05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, when looking for news about Ukraine online I come across "Euromaidan Press" a lot. It is good to have a Wikipedia article that tells the background of this organisation. It is good that people can find out on an indipendent platform, Wikipedia, that "Euromaidan Press" was set up by
Euromaidan-supporting people and not by
Russian trolls. Article is also well sourced. — Yulia Romero •
Talk to me!12:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.