From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). — Mythdon ( talkcontribs) 08:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Euromaidan Press (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artice created by a by a banned sockpuppet in violation of topic ban: the article is about politically-driven news-site. Also nonnotable subject. Independent sources cited are only for various facts not directly about Euromaidan Press, i.e., despite numerous footnotes, it is one big WP:SYNTH. Staszek Lem ( talk) 01:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets GNG with sources such as this. I dispute the nominator's opinion hat it is just one big synth piece. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 14:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sockpuppetry is a behavioural matter, not a reason for deletion; executing your proposed deletion would be an act of punishment, and we are above that. Moreover, the references unarguably support the topic. -- pmj ( talk) 05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, when looking for news about Ukraine online I come across "Euromaidan Press" a lot. It is good to have a Wikipedia article that tells the background of this organisation. It is good that people can find out on an indipendent platform, Wikipedia, that "Euromaidan Press" was set up by Euromaidan-supporting people and not by Russian trolls. Article is also well sourced. — Yulia Romero •  Talk to me! 12:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). — Mythdon ( talkcontribs) 08:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Euromaidan Press (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artice created by a by a banned sockpuppet in violation of topic ban: the article is about politically-driven news-site. Also nonnotable subject. Independent sources cited are only for various facts not directly about Euromaidan Press, i.e., despite numerous footnotes, it is one big WP:SYNTH. Staszek Lem ( talk) 01:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets GNG with sources such as this. I dispute the nominator's opinion hat it is just one big synth piece. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 14:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sockpuppetry is a behavioural matter, not a reason for deletion; executing your proposed deletion would be an act of punishment, and we are above that. Moreover, the references unarguably support the topic. -- pmj ( talk) 05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, when looking for news about Ukraine online I come across "Euromaidan Press" a lot. It is good to have a Wikipedia article that tells the background of this organisation. It is good that people can find out on an indipendent platform, Wikipedia, that "Euromaidan Press" was set up by Euromaidan-supporting people and not by Russian trolls. Article is also well sourced. — Yulia Romero •  Talk to me! 12:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook