- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 07:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Eugene Patterson Harris
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eugene Patterson Harris ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable lawyer and unsuccessful political candidate. some of his clients may have been notable, but that does not make him notable DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete just because California has a jungle primary does not make it so everyone in the primary is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG and User:Bearian/Standards#Non-notability. I agree this should be deleted, but I question that representing a notable defendant does not add to a lawyer's potential notability. I think it's just one factor. In any case, he does not pass my standards for notable lawyers, at this time, subject to re-creation when needed. Bearian ( talk) 19:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL and is not independently notable outside of his campaign. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 16:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 07:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Eugene Patterson Harris
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eugene Patterson Harris ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable lawyer and unsuccessful political candidate. some of his clients may have been notable, but that does not make him notable DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete just because California has a jungle primary does not make it so everyone in the primary is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG and User:Bearian/Standards#Non-notability. I agree this should be deleted, but I question that representing a notable defendant does not add to a lawyer's potential notability. I think it's just one factor. In any case, he does not pass my standards for notable lawyers, at this time, subject to re-creation when needed. Bearian ( talk) 19:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL and is not independently notable outside of his campaign. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 16:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.