The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle(Check!) 08:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC)reply
This article is an essay on racism. I don't think there's anything that can be salvaged, valid points are covered in better articles, and a redirect wouldn't make much sense. --
Kjkolb 13:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete as a neologism. As pointed out in the nom, most if not all of the valid arguments in this article are covered elsewhere (and if there are any that are not they should be cleaned up and added to the existing article on
Racism. I will give the author some kudos for at least sourcing the article... even if it is poorly written.--
Isotope23 15:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete as personal POV essay. It's probably OR as well, given that the inline sources are simply dicdefs of the phrases used, rather than actual sources. The sources at the bottom are not referred to directly to support the arguments.
MCB 23:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Sjakkalle(Check!) 08:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC)reply
This article is an essay on racism. I don't think there's anything that can be salvaged, valid points are covered in better articles, and a redirect wouldn't make much sense. --
Kjkolb 13:24, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete as a neologism. As pointed out in the nom, most if not all of the valid arguments in this article are covered elsewhere (and if there are any that are not they should be cleaned up and added to the existing article on
Racism. I will give the author some kudos for at least sourcing the article... even if it is poorly written.--
Isotope23 15:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete as personal POV essay. It's probably OR as well, given that the inline sources are simply dicdefs of the phrases used, rather than actual sources. The sources at the bottom are not referred to directly to support the arguments.
MCB 23:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.