- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Smartyllama ( talk) 15:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Estadio Argelio Sabillón ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is a stadium and it exists. At best this should be a merge/redirect to
C.D. Real Juventud. Doesn't have an article on Spanish Wikipedia and only an unreferenced one-liner on French Wikipedia. Stadium not significant in terms of its history, size or longevity.
Boleyn (
talk)
09:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep clearly passes WP:GNG, just needs a little research in periodicos catrachos. I've improved it a bit - need to do more research, the articles I've found aren't great, but it's clearly significantly covered as a top flight stadium. SportingFlyer T· C 18:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep passes GNG. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 11:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG. There's no need to delete it. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 21:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination due to helpful comments above and improved refs being found. Boleyn ( talk) 08:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Smartyllama ( talk) 15:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Estadio Argelio Sabillón ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is a stadium and it exists. At best this should be a merge/redirect to
C.D. Real Juventud. Doesn't have an article on Spanish Wikipedia and only an unreferenced one-liner on French Wikipedia. Stadium not significant in terms of its history, size or longevity.
Boleyn (
talk)
09:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep clearly passes WP:GNG, just needs a little research in periodicos catrachos. I've improved it a bit - need to do more research, the articles I've found aren't great, but it's clearly significantly covered as a top flight stadium. SportingFlyer T· C 18:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep passes GNG. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 11:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG. There's no need to delete it. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 21:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination due to helpful comments above and improved refs being found. Boleyn ( talk) 08:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.