- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Esquon, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For once one of the California place name books comes through, in this case Gudde, who states that the rail location is named after a larger locale which was a land grant/farm. That's also what the aerials show: the topos show a cluster of buildings, but GMaps and older aerial views show a large farmstead with a few accessory houses. The railroad is long gone, of course. The fact of the name as a locale is well-established, but it doesn't seem notable. Mangoe ( talk) 02:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A few newspaper articles mention Rancho Esquon, Esquon Station and a road that goes there, but it appears to be a locale and not a populated place. No sign that this meets GNG in any case. – dlthewave ☎ 05:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle ( talk) 10:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable locality. -- Lockley ( talk) 10:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Currently does not meet GNG. -- Mhhossein talk 10:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Esquon, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
For once one of the California place name books comes through, in this case Gudde, who states that the rail location is named after a larger locale which was a land grant/farm. That's also what the aerials show: the topos show a cluster of buildings, but GMaps and older aerial views show a large farmstead with a few accessory houses. The railroad is long gone, of course. The fact of the name as a locale is well-established, but it doesn't seem notable. Mangoe ( talk) 02:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 14:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete A few newspaper articles mention Rancho Esquon, Esquon Station and a road that goes there, but it appears to be a locale and not a populated place. No sign that this meets GNG in any case. – dlthewave ☎ 05:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle ( talk) 10:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable locality. -- Lockley ( talk) 10:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Currently does not meet GNG. -- Mhhossein talk 10:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.