This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. IceKarma ॐ 23:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Not notable, only claims to notability are distant relationships to other people. May even be a hoax because I doubt it's possible to prove who a person's 44th great-grandfather is.-- Carabinieri 14:39, 17 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. IceKarma ॐ 23:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Not notable, only claims to notability are distant relationships to other people. May even be a hoax because I doubt it's possible to prove who a person's 44th great-grandfather is.-- Carabinieri 14:39, 17 September 2005 (UTC) reply