The result was no consensus. I'll R3 the redirect. T. Canens ( talk) 01:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article title is clearly wrong, but this AfD is primarily about the single itself, which doesn't seem to warrant its own page. There is no significant coverage of its own that shows it warrants a page outside of the album. — Timneu22 · talk 13:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I shall endeavour to cover it's subsequent bootleggery and inclusion on several retrospective (and sought after) collections! Bennydigital ( talk) 17:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I'll R3 the redirect. T. Canens ( talk) 01:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The article title is clearly wrong, but this AfD is primarily about the single itself, which doesn't seem to warrant its own page. There is no significant coverage of its own that shows it warrants a page outside of the album. — Timneu22 · talk 13:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply
I shall endeavour to cover it's subsequent bootleggery and inclusion on several retrospective (and sought after) collections! Bennydigital ( talk) 17:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply