The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. This article was originally nominated for CSD and I find that the allbusiness.com source to be leaning too far toward legitimacy to delete the article. The article is still promotional in nature and could probably still be deletable under G11 criteria. However, I'm taking it to the community to decide it's notability. Trusilver 03:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
What can I do to make it non-promotional? I am not intending it to be a promotional article. 71.197.153.187 ( talk) 05:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Once again, what should be changed to make it non-promotional? I have cited three separate magazine articles discussing eng-tips.com 71.197.153.187 ( talk) 05:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
So I am hearing three complaints:
This is the fifth iteration of the article. The previous four were deleted within hours. The reason why it needs serious work is I am reluctant to put significant time into editing until I know that the article will not be speedily deleted. Lgmagone ( talk) 19:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. This article was originally nominated for CSD and I find that the allbusiness.com source to be leaning too far toward legitimacy to delete the article. The article is still promotional in nature and could probably still be deletable under G11 criteria. However, I'm taking it to the community to decide it's notability. Trusilver 03:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
What can I do to make it non-promotional? I am not intending it to be a promotional article. 71.197.153.187 ( talk) 05:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Once again, what should be changed to make it non-promotional? I have cited three separate magazine articles discussing eng-tips.com 71.197.153.187 ( talk) 05:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
So I am hearing three complaints:
This is the fifth iteration of the article. The previous four were deleted within hours. The reason why it needs serious work is I am reluctant to put significant time into editing until I know that the article will not be speedily deleted. Lgmagone ( talk) 19:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply