The result was merged to Emirates Airline. -- Reinoutr ( talk) 08:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Aside from being advertorial in nature, the subject lacks multiple, non-trivial, independent sources which would afford the subject notability in an encyclopaedic context, thereby it also fails WP:V. Additionally, if one refers to the current version of the article, the first reference doesn't even mention Emirates, and has been lifted from another article for anothr airline. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 12:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merged to Emirates Airline. -- Reinoutr ( talk) 08:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Aside from being advertorial in nature, the subject lacks multiple, non-trivial, independent sources which would afford the subject notability in an encyclopaedic context, thereby it also fails WP:V. Additionally, if one refers to the current version of the article, the first reference doesn't even mention Emirates, and has been lifted from another article for anothr airline. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 12:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply