The result was Close. I'm being WP:BOLD and closing this discussion. The article, in its current state, is a different article than nominated-for-deletion article. In addition, the consensus seems to be for a Redirect. Moreover, the original nominator has withdrawn his/her deletion proposal. Therefore, the discussion for redirect or keep as a seperate article is more appropiate for the Embedded marketing and product placement talk pages. And I have tagged both articles with a merger proposals and initiated a discussion at Talk:Product placement/Archives/2012#Merger proposal. If after a discusison at the talk pages, there's no basis for having two seperate articles, Embedded marketing will be redirected to Product placement.-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete: article appears to be about a concept promoted by the author's company. No
sources provided apart from this company's website.
AndrewWTaylor (
talk) 18:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
*Delete - covert spam. If it existed as a term outside the original spammer's website, I'd say make it into a redir to
product placement. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 17:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Close. I'm being WP:BOLD and closing this discussion. The article, in its current state, is a different article than nominated-for-deletion article. In addition, the consensus seems to be for a Redirect. Moreover, the original nominator has withdrawn his/her deletion proposal. Therefore, the discussion for redirect or keep as a seperate article is more appropiate for the Embedded marketing and product placement talk pages. And I have tagged both articles with a merger proposals and initiated a discussion at Talk:Product placement/Archives/2012#Merger proposal. If after a discusison at the talk pages, there's no basis for having two seperate articles, Embedded marketing will be redirected to Product placement.-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete: article appears to be about a concept promoted by the author's company. No
sources provided apart from this company's website.
AndrewWTaylor (
talk) 18:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
reply
*Delete - covert spam. If it existed as a term outside the original spammer's website, I'd say make it into a redir to
product placement. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 17:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
reply