The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable . This article is merely a list of ambassadors. Also oppose merge as ambassador listings are not included in bilaterals or foreign relations Articles.
LibStar (
talk) 11:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Embassies and lists of Ambassadors. Embassies are notable buildings in the cities they inhabit. This is not a particuarly good page but a list of Swedish Ambassadors to Mexico should be retained.
MLA (
talk) 04:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)reply
no, embassies are not inherently notable.
LibStar (
talk) 06:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 02:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)reply
a list of ambassadors is not a free pass to notability.
LibStar (
talk) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Embassy and Ambassador list. MLA is right, the article needs to be improved, but embassies are major landmarks in their cities, as well as major symbols of diplomacy and bilateral relations.
Scanlan (
talk) 00:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
they may be "major " but they do not have inherent notability. So far none of the keep voters have presented any sources .
LibStar (
talk) 08:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable . This article is merely a list of ambassadors. Also oppose merge as ambassador listings are not included in bilaterals or foreign relations Articles.
LibStar (
talk) 11:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Embassies and lists of Ambassadors. Embassies are notable buildings in the cities they inhabit. This is not a particuarly good page but a list of Swedish Ambassadors to Mexico should be retained.
MLA (
talk) 04:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)reply
no, embassies are not inherently notable.
LibStar (
talk) 06:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 02:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)reply
a list of ambassadors is not a free pass to notability.
LibStar (
talk) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Embassy and Ambassador list. MLA is right, the article needs to be improved, but embassies are major landmarks in their cities, as well as major symbols of diplomacy and bilateral relations.
Scanlan (
talk) 00:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
they may be "major " but they do not have inherent notability. So far none of the keep voters have presented any sources .
LibStar (
talk) 08:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.