- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Elizabeth Scott (author)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Elizabeth Scott (author) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could also maybe redirect to Living Dead Girl (novel).
Only reliable secondary source simply mentions that the author is writing for an imprint. No other indications of notability other than writing one book, Living Dead Girl (novel), which appears to be notable as a winner of several young adult book awards. Fails to meet WP:AUTHOR in my eyes.
Also, see related AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As I Wake. Sasquatch t| c 19:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sasquatch t| c 19:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The notability criteria for creative professionals include 'The person has created ... a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews'. I've added reviews of her works and see that most of them have had multiple reviews in the specialist press. So Scott seems to meet this criterion quite readily. Alarichall ( talk) 08:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The article could be expanded, yes, but Elizabeth Scott has had quite a few books published, and she has enough third-party sources to establish notability. TH1980 ( talk) 05:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Elizabeth Scott (author)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Elizabeth Scott (author) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could also maybe redirect to Living Dead Girl (novel).
Only reliable secondary source simply mentions that the author is writing for an imprint. No other indications of notability other than writing one book, Living Dead Girl (novel), which appears to be notable as a winner of several young adult book awards. Fails to meet WP:AUTHOR in my eyes.
Also, see related AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As I Wake. Sasquatch t| c 19:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sasquatch t| c 19:47, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. The notability criteria for creative professionals include 'The person has created ... a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews'. I've added reviews of her works and see that most of them have had multiple reviews in the specialist press. So Scott seems to meet this criterion quite readily. Alarichall ( talk) 08:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The article could be expanded, yes, but Elizabeth Scott has had quite a few books published, and she has enough third-party sources to establish notability. TH1980 ( talk) 05:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.