The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE as copyvio from
[1].
Harro5 00:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Contested PROD. Blatant spam. Site itself is non-notable per
WP:WEB. Can't see a way to speedy this, but do so if possible. Delete. --Kinut/
c 08:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as non-notable website and advertisement --
TBC????????? 08:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per TBC. Alexa ranking 146,000+.
Feezo(Talk) 08:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, bad ad per nom. Will need to clean up all the other pages he's linked to this one assuming delete consensus is reached.
Kurutalk 15:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, nn website, spam. --
Terence Ong 16:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per above --
Khoikhoi 22:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE as copyvio from
[1].
Harro5 00:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Contested PROD. Blatant spam. Site itself is non-notable per
WP:WEB. Can't see a way to speedy this, but do so if possible. Delete. --Kinut/
c 08:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as non-notable website and advertisement --
TBC????????? 08:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per TBC. Alexa ranking 146,000+.
Feezo(Talk) 08:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, bad ad per nom. Will need to clean up all the other pages he's linked to this one assuming delete consensus is reached.
Kurutalk 15:13, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete, nn website, spam. --
Terence Ong 16:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per above --
Khoikhoi 22:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.