The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
non-notable pornographic actress, no sources found for RS (only videos of her performances). Working in marketing and on webcam is non-notable.
Oaktree b (
talk)
23:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable pornographic actress due to total absence of any sort of media footprint (besides her video performances, which are plenty). To the creator: similar article belongs on an aggregator resource such as IMDB for pornographic actresses. But not on Wikipedia.
MitYehor (
talk)
21:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
"People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Are you able to provide 2 or more sources which meet the
general notability guidelines? - "Ghost of Dan Gurney"(
work /
talk)21:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete as after a Google search, there is a lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources beyond the AVN piece so that
WP:GNG is not passed in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
non-notable pornographic actress, no sources found for RS (only videos of her performances). Working in marketing and on webcam is non-notable.
Oaktree b (
talk)
23:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable pornographic actress due to total absence of any sort of media footprint (besides her video performances, which are plenty). To the creator: similar article belongs on an aggregator resource such as IMDB for pornographic actresses. But not on Wikipedia.
MitYehor (
talk)
21:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
"People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Are you able to provide 2 or more sources which meet the
general notability guidelines? - "Ghost of Dan Gurney"(
work /
talk)21:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete as after a Google search, there is a lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources beyond the AVN piece so that
WP:GNG is not passed in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.