- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Already relisted once, still unsourced. WP:REFUND applies if sources meeting WP:GNG can be found. ST47 ( talk) 01:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
El Gilano
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- El Gilano ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Previously deleted by prod in 2016. Per WP:NRIVALRY, sports rivalries do not have inherent notability, so this would need to meet WP:GNG, which it does not do. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It could meet WP:GNG. I have no idea. A Farsi-language search will be required. An English-language search shows it at least passes WP:V, but sigcov is possibly understandably lacking. SportingFlyer T· C 18:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment' I have to agree with SportingFlyer here. You cannot claim that it fails WP:GNG until you can confidently say that there are no Farsi-language sources on the topic. The AfD is already listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iran so that might attract a competent reviewer. Pichpich ( talk) 21:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88( talk) 15:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Already relisted once, still unsourced. WP:REFUND applies if sources meeting WP:GNG can be found. ST47 ( talk) 01:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
El Gilano
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- El Gilano ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Previously deleted by prod in 2016. Per WP:NRIVALRY, sports rivalries do not have inherent notability, so this would need to meet WP:GNG, which it does not do. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup ( talk) 14:16, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It could meet WP:GNG. I have no idea. A Farsi-language search will be required. An English-language search shows it at least passes WP:V, but sigcov is possibly understandably lacking. SportingFlyer T· C 18:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment' I have to agree with SportingFlyer here. You cannot claim that it fails WP:GNG until you can confidently say that there are no Farsi-language sources on the topic. The AfD is already listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Iran so that might attract a competent reviewer. Pichpich ( talk) 21:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88( talk) 15:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.