- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
El Clásico Boricua
- El Clásico Boricua ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See WP:NRIVALRY. No evidence of WP:GNG anywhere within the article; an internet search of some relevant terms doesn't come up with anything significant and, in fact, most of the articles relate to a baseball rivalry of the same name. Also, this rivalry has apparently only existed since 2010 (when the two teams first met). Spiderone 13:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down ( talk) 09:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
El Clásico Boricua
- El Clásico Boricua ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See WP:NRIVALRY. No evidence of WP:GNG anywhere within the article; an internet search of some relevant terms doesn't come up with anything significant and, in fact, most of the articles relate to a baseball rivalry of the same name. Also, this rivalry has apparently only existed since 2010 (when the two teams first met). Spiderone 13:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down ( talk) 09:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.