- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 05:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Ek Deewana Tha (TV series)
- Ek Deewana Tha (TV series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is a TV show that has not yet aired. PROD removed without substantial improvement. First reference was a from tellygossip; replacement reference is 15-second YouTube from Sony, not a secondary source. This article may be submitted again when show airs. Rhadow ( talk) 12:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This AfD discussion was created on 6 September 2017, but it was transcluded the 2 September 2017 daily log. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This article was added for Afd discussion due to lack of sources. However, this article has been updated with other sources which I think are appropriate. Hence, I would request to check the article & remove it from the discussion as this has relevant source of information. Nazmamumtaz008 ( talk) 08:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 08:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 08:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No reliable sources (pinterest is anything but a reliable source!) and no indication of notability, and it is so promotionally written that once it becomes notable, the article would have to be completely rewritten anyway (in fact I think it could have been a speedy deletion candidate as pure advertising). -- bonadea contributions talk 08:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: There are more sources added to the article for improvement. It is for an upcoming tv series on Sony tv which is soon going on air. I would request you to kindly help in improving the article to avoid deletion.
Regards Nazmamumtaz008 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- The sources do not give any kind of significant coverage; they are trivial mentions of gossip around the show. Yes, it is upcoming, and hence it is unlikely that it is notable yet. As requested I have done a little bit of cleanup/improvement, but there is nothing that can be done to the article in order to create notability, if it doesn't exist. -- bonadea contributions talk 05:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:TVSERIES. Also, WP:TOOSOON. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 23:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete agree with GeoffreyT2000. I do see a lot of mentions, so anyone we can ATD redirect this to? Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 02:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Possibly redirect to Namik Paul (actor) until it is released? L3X1 (distænt write) 02:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 05:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Ek Deewana Tha (TV series)
- Ek Deewana Tha (TV series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is a TV show that has not yet aired. PROD removed without substantial improvement. First reference was a from tellygossip; replacement reference is 15-second YouTube from Sony, not a secondary source. This article may be submitted again when show airs. Rhadow ( talk) 12:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This AfD discussion was created on 6 September 2017, but it was transcluded the 2 September 2017 daily log. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This article was added for Afd discussion due to lack of sources. However, this article has been updated with other sources which I think are appropriate. Hence, I would request to check the article & remove it from the discussion as this has relevant source of information. Nazmamumtaz008 ( talk) 08:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 08:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 08:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No reliable sources (pinterest is anything but a reliable source!) and no indication of notability, and it is so promotionally written that once it becomes notable, the article would have to be completely rewritten anyway (in fact I think it could have been a speedy deletion candidate as pure advertising). -- bonadea contributions talk 08:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: There are more sources added to the article for improvement. It is for an upcoming tv series on Sony tv which is soon going on air. I would request you to kindly help in improving the article to avoid deletion.
Regards Nazmamumtaz008 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- The sources do not give any kind of significant coverage; they are trivial mentions of gossip around the show. Yes, it is upcoming, and hence it is unlikely that it is notable yet. As requested I have done a little bit of cleanup/improvement, but there is nothing that can be done to the article in order to create notability, if it doesn't exist. -- bonadea contributions talk 05:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:TVSERIES. Also, WP:TOOSOON. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 23:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete agree with GeoffreyT2000. I do see a lot of mentions, so anyone we can ATD redirect this to? Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 02:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Possibly redirect to Namik Paul (actor) until it is released? L3X1 (distænt write) 02:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.