The result was Delete on strength of arguments. The previous discussion was a "no consensus", the "realwolrd information" is not relevant for the article (education of the authors), it is not indicated which parts may be worth keeping or merging... On the other hand, "I support deletion because X does" is an ignorable argument as well. Fram ( talk) 13:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I created this page about a year ago and I've decided that it's time to try to kill my own creation. It is just a random group of information - what schools the writers & characters went to, a list of schools, etc. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is also no real world info, other than the list of what writers went to Harvard, but that is complete listcruft. -- Scorpion 0422 14:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete on strength of arguments. The previous discussion was a "no consensus", the "realwolrd information" is not relevant for the article (education of the authors), it is not indicated which parts may be worth keeping or merging... On the other hand, "I support deletion because X does" is an ignorable argument as well. Fram ( talk) 13:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
I created this page about a year ago and I've decided that it's time to try to kill my own creation. It is just a random group of information - what schools the writers & characters went to, a list of schools, etc. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is also no real world info, other than the list of what writers went to Harvard, but that is complete listcruft. -- Scorpion 0422 14:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reply