The result was delete. joe decker talk to me 15:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable character. JJ98 ( Talk) 16:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC) reply
It also meets WP:FICT. Bailo26 17:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC) replyKeep. I mean, c'mon. Jimmy Neutron has one. Spongebob Squarepants has one. Why not Ed?
— 989 RVD
WP:OSE: —
- Another contributor may respond simply by saying that just because other stuff exists does not mean that the article in question should be kept. While perhaps a legitimate response, the automatic dismissal of such a statement is just as lacking in rationale and thus the second user has provided no reason to delete the article.
I do not mean to get into an argument, I just cannot see how you can write a response simply stating that other stuff exists. It makes little or no sense to me. Bailo26 22:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. joe decker talk to me 15:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable character. JJ98 ( Talk) 16:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC) reply
It also meets WP:FICT. Bailo26 17:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC) replyKeep. I mean, c'mon. Jimmy Neutron has one. Spongebob Squarepants has one. Why not Ed?
— 989 RVD
WP:OSE: —
- Another contributor may respond simply by saying that just because other stuff exists does not mean that the article in question should be kept. While perhaps a legitimate response, the automatic dismissal of such a statement is just as lacking in rationale and thus the second user has provided no reason to delete the article.
I do not mean to get into an argument, I just cannot see how you can write a response simply stating that other stuff exists. It makes little or no sense to me. Bailo26 22:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC) reply