The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 09:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)reply
I propose this should redirect to
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes because the majority of its sources are also linked to in the main article. This season does not stand alone among the rest for notability, just quality IMO. See my similar AfDs for the season 3 and 4 articles.
Paper LuigiT •
C 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge: I don't have anything against keeping this article, but neither do I have anything against merging the plot descriptions into
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes and the rest of the article's info into
Ed, Edd n Eddy. -
Jpcase (
talk) 15:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This was a non-admin relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DannyS712 (
talk) 05:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: Proposing deletion of good articles without reassessing first? I’m cautious. But looking at it for what it is, I don’t see much of a reason to delete it (or season 2).
Trillfendi (
talk) 07:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge or redirect for consistency with the others seasons. This isn't significantly more notable that it would warrant a page but not others. See uncontested AfDs for
3,
4, and
5 (6 never had an AfD).
Џ 04:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)reply
There's some interesting info in this article currently absent from the parent article - e.g. Mike Drucker's review of the series for IGN, the column by the Tallahassee journalist about jawbreakers, and the sentence about early fansites. So merging would be the best way to go. --
Jpcase (
talk) 16:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, if necessary, the episode synopses can be moved to the list for the season on [List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes]]. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2601:241:300:C930:CD1E:F589:9178:738E (
talk) 02:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep for the fact alone that this article is a
WP:GA. IMO, get the article demoted/delisted first.
Steel1943 (
talk) 02:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Article has information relevant to this specific season, and is also filled with enough valid content to have a separate article. Most shows do have their seasons as different articles if a significant size.
DreamFocus 12:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep A season can be notable and the article has enough content for its own article.
Wikiman5676 (
talk) 02:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 09:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)reply
I propose this should redirect to
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes because the majority of its sources are also linked to in the main article. This season does not stand alone among the rest for notability, just quality IMO. See my similar AfDs for the season 3 and 4 articles.
Paper LuigiT •
C 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge: I don't have anything against keeping this article, but neither do I have anything against merging the plot descriptions into
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes and the rest of the article's info into
Ed, Edd n Eddy. -
Jpcase (
talk) 15:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This was a non-admin relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DannyS712 (
talk) 05:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: Proposing deletion of good articles without reassessing first? I’m cautious. But looking at it for what it is, I don’t see much of a reason to delete it (or season 2).
Trillfendi (
talk) 07:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge or redirect for consistency with the others seasons. This isn't significantly more notable that it would warrant a page but not others. See uncontested AfDs for
3,
4, and
5 (6 never had an AfD).
Џ 04:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)reply
There's some interesting info in this article currently absent from the parent article - e.g. Mike Drucker's review of the series for IGN, the column by the Tallahassee journalist about jawbreakers, and the sentence about early fansites. So merging would be the best way to go. --
Jpcase (
talk) 16:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, if necessary, the episode synopses can be moved to the list for the season on [List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes]]. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2601:241:300:C930:CD1E:F589:9178:738E (
talk) 02:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep for the fact alone that this article is a
WP:GA. IMO, get the article demoted/delisted first.
Steel1943 (
talk) 02:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Article has information relevant to this specific season, and is also filled with enough valid content to have a separate article. Most shows do have their seasons as different articles if a significant size.
DreamFocus 12:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep A season can be notable and the article has enough content for its own article.
Wikiman5676 (
talk) 02:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.