- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Diffusion of innovations. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Eco-innovation diffusion
- Eco-innovation diffusion ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This poorly written article (term paper?) covers material that is a hyper-specialized form of Diffusion of innovations and the topic is relatively well covered in that article already. A redirect there would be good. Toddst1 ( talk) 18:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Diffusion of innovations. Not notable on its own. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Diffusion of innovations. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Eco-innovation diffusion
- Eco-innovation diffusion ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This poorly written article (term paper?) covers material that is a hyper-specialized form of Diffusion of innovations and the topic is relatively well covered in that article already. A redirect there would be good. Toddst1 ( talk) 18:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 06:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 15:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Diffusion of innovations. Not notable on its own. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.