- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletions beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 15:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Echizen ware ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article has no sources Celestinesucess ( talk) 08:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The article has no source is not a valid reason to delete the page. Though I agree that I can't find enough independent sources to make this article notable. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Coderzombie (
talk •
contribs)
08:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sources added. And let's not go overboard with this deletion policy.
Gryffindor (
talk)
08:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
-
Gryffindor, Overboard or not, AfD tags shouldn't be removed until the debate is over.
Coderzombie (
talk)
09:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Coderzombie, removing content that is supporting the article is disruptive behaviour. You can readd the tags, but do not remove any content. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 10:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
-
Gryffindor, Overboard or not, AfD tags shouldn't be removed until the debate is over.
Coderzombie (
talk)
09:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sources added. And let's not go overboard with this deletion policy.
Gryffindor (
talk)
08:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG, I have added a handful of English language {{ Cite book}}s to sources. Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article, and doing a modicum of mandatory searching prior to nomination saves time. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Precisely. Thank you Sam Sailor. Gryffindor ( talk) 11:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Sam Sailor has shown that the sources certainly exist to satify [WP:GNG]]. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 00:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep; GNG is met with Sam Sailor's sources. Kharkiv07 ( T) 00:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Has plenty of reliable independent sources. Article passes WP:GNG. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 08:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletions beyond the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 15:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Echizen ware ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article has no sources Celestinesucess ( talk) 08:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The article has no source is not a valid reason to delete the page. Though I agree that I can't find enough independent sources to make this article notable. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Coderzombie (
talk •
contribs)
08:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sources added. And let's not go overboard with this deletion policy.
Gryffindor (
talk)
08:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
-
Gryffindor, Overboard or not, AfD tags shouldn't be removed until the debate is over.
Coderzombie (
talk)
09:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Coderzombie, removing content that is supporting the article is disruptive behaviour. You can readd the tags, but do not remove any content. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 10:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
-
Gryffindor, Overboard or not, AfD tags shouldn't be removed until the debate is over.
Coderzombie (
talk)
09:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sources added. And let's not go overboard with this deletion policy.
Gryffindor (
talk)
08:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG, I have added a handful of English language {{ Cite book}}s to sources. Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article, and doing a modicum of mandatory searching prior to nomination saves time. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Precisely. Thank you Sam Sailor. Gryffindor ( talk) 11:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Sam Sailor has shown that the sources certainly exist to satify [WP:GNG]]. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 00:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep; GNG is met with Sam Sailor's sources. Kharkiv07 ( T) 00:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Has plenty of reliable independent sources. Article passes WP:GNG. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 08:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.