- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (utter) @ 18:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Eastfoldish
- Eastfoldish ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Joke article about a nonexistent language, created by an editor with a history of joke edits like adding Morroco to Kven language. The editor is blocked on the Norwegian Wikipedia for creating joke articles. ISO 639-3 code doesn't exist, nor is there any eastfoldish on Glottolog. No mention of the language anywhere but on Wikipedia.Speedy was declined. Sjö ( talk) 13:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Hoax. No hits on anything except for Wikipedia and Wikipedia content mirrors. Kolbasz ( talk) 14:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: See related AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svinesundish. Kolbasz ( talk) 14:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) @ 20:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Given the lack of information in the article and the absence of non-Wikipedia Google hits, I think this can be speedily deleted per WP:A1: No context. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 22:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete really does seem like a hoax to me; can't find any hits either. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 06:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete -A suitable WP:A11 candidate. Made-up by creator, no sign of significance. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 16:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (utter) @ 18:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Eastfoldish
- Eastfoldish ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Joke article about a nonexistent language, created by an editor with a history of joke edits like adding Morroco to Kven language. The editor is blocked on the Norwegian Wikipedia for creating joke articles. ISO 639-3 code doesn't exist, nor is there any eastfoldish on Glottolog. No mention of the language anywhere but on Wikipedia.Speedy was declined. Sjö ( talk) 13:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Hoax. No hits on anything except for Wikipedia and Wikipedia content mirrors. Kolbasz ( talk) 14:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: See related AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svinesundish. Kolbasz ( talk) 14:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) @ 20:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Given the lack of information in the article and the absence of non-Wikipedia Google hits, I think this can be speedily deleted per WP:A1: No context. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 22:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete really does seem like a hoax to me; can't find any hits either. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 06:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete -A suitable WP:A11 candidate. Made-up by creator, no sign of significance. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 16:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.