- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 20:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
EM simulation software
- EM simulation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page contains no encyclopedic content and is uninformative, with no clear potential for improvement. A complete rewrite may be possible if sufficient information and sources could be obtained. MopSeeker ( talk) 04:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Software comparison pages are relatively common on wikipedia (Category:Software comparisons has over 150 articles). When all of the software compared have individual pages/ are independently notable, as is the case here, such comparisons can be useful and encyclopedic. Dialectric ( talk) 19:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per above. In my opinion, this does contain encyclopedic content and is helpful to readers who are interested in this type of topic. BenLinus 1214 talk 22:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
If the page is to be kept, then it may be best to move it to a name that indicates its nature as a comparison, and add more software to the comparison. The original page title may then be used for an article describing the type of software. MopSeeker ( talk) 05:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree on the rename/move, and can make that change if the afd closes as keep. Dialectric ( talk) 00:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 20:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
EM simulation software
- EM simulation software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page contains no encyclopedic content and is uninformative, with no clear potential for improvement. A complete rewrite may be possible if sufficient information and sources could be obtained. MopSeeker ( talk) 04:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 06:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 23:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Software comparison pages are relatively common on wikipedia (Category:Software comparisons has over 150 articles). When all of the software compared have individual pages/ are independently notable, as is the case here, such comparisons can be useful and encyclopedic. Dialectric ( talk) 19:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per above. In my opinion, this does contain encyclopedic content and is helpful to readers who are interested in this type of topic. BenLinus 1214 talk 22:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
If the page is to be kept, then it may be best to move it to a name that indicates its nature as a comparison, and add more software to the comparison. The original page title may then be used for an article describing the type of software. MopSeeker ( talk) 05:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree on the rename/move, and can make that change if the afd closes as keep. Dialectric ( talk) 00:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.