- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and salt. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- EKincare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company fails to expresses an identity, it is too early to have a Wikipedia page for the company. Ireneshih ( talk) 16:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A recent start-up whose references in the article and elsewhere are just routine start-up funding announcements. No evidence found that this firm is notable at this time. AllyD ( talk) 20:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources suggest that it is a product, not a company. One source shows that a company has secured some funding, a second shows a beta product has been produced. It fails to pass WP:PRODUCT. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 21:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply not yet notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete, entirely non notable article. Is this a re-creation of a speedied article??? I have no idea why else the article is on my watchlist. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Now you mention it, a check at the log shows 2 previous deletions in the past few months. Maybe a case for WP:SALT. AllyD ( talk) 17:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to what's above, it looks like the primary registered user & the unregistered IP involved in editing it are also the people responsible for the BitChemy Ventures page, that's the VC firm funding this. I'm oretty sure that's a WP:COI issue. JamesG5 ( talk) 23:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Though there are a handful of RS covering the company, it is just a start up that has not yet reached notability guidelines. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and salt. -- MelanieN ( talk) 02:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- EKincare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company fails to expresses an identity, it is too early to have a Wikipedia page for the company. Ireneshih ( talk) 16:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A recent start-up whose references in the article and elsewhere are just routine start-up funding announcements. No evidence found that this firm is notable at this time. AllyD ( talk) 20:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources suggest that it is a product, not a company. One source shows that a company has secured some funding, a second shows a beta product has been produced. It fails to pass WP:PRODUCT. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 21:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015 TALK 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply not yet notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Delete, entirely non notable article. Is this a re-creation of a speedied article??? I have no idea why else the article is on my watchlist. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Now you mention it, a check at the log shows 2 previous deletions in the past few months. Maybe a case for WP:SALT. AllyD ( talk) 17:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to what's above, it looks like the primary registered user & the unregistered IP involved in editing it are also the people responsible for the BitChemy Ventures page, that's the VC firm funding this. I'm oretty sure that's a WP:COI issue. JamesG5 ( talk) 23:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Though there are a handful of RS covering the company, it is just a start up that has not yet reached notability guidelines. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.