From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 13:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Dwarves Assemble

Dwarves Assemble (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded yesterday for failing WP:GNG by having no secondary sources, deprodded by the article creator with the WP:ILIKEIT reasoning that the show "deserves to be found and read about. [...] Watch it, you'll understand why." McGeddon ( talk) 08:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete lack of reliable sources. Notability is not inherited. -- Bejnar ( talk) 03:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 13:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Dwarves Assemble

Dwarves Assemble (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded yesterday for failing WP:GNG by having no secondary sources, deprodded by the article creator with the WP:ILIKEIT reasoning that the show "deserves to be found and read about. [...] Watch it, you'll understand why." McGeddon ( talk) 08:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete lack of reliable sources. Notability is not inherited. -- Bejnar ( talk) 03:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook