- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. bd2412 T 15:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Dustin Cumming
- Dustin Cumming ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per prior AfD, by User:reddogsix:
Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The fact that all but one keep votes appeared to come from socks of a COI account radically changes the balance of the discussion. Anmccaff ( talk) 18:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable real estate agent. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
*Delete. He is not a notable real estate agent. Not enough reliable, third party sources. Selling to NFL players and other celebrities does not bestow notability. desmay ( talk) 00:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- delete just a promotional page, created by a now-blocked sock. Jytdog ( talk) 01:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not notable per available sources. Name is shared with notable people and that does not make it easy to do research. However, if he was an important tv personality I'd expect there to be a detailed IMDb profile. More likely gave some professional commentary. In a worse case scenario he's counting commercial time. Either way not good enough. gidonb ( talk) 01:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. bd2412 T 15:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Dustin Cumming
- Dustin Cumming ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per prior AfD, by User:reddogsix:
Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The fact that all but one keep votes appeared to come from socks of a COI account radically changes the balance of the discussion. Anmccaff ( talk) 18:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable real estate agent. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
*Delete. He is not a notable real estate agent. Not enough reliable, third party sources. Selling to NFL players and other celebrities does not bestow notability. desmay ( talk) 00:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- delete just a promotional page, created by a now-blocked sock. Jytdog ( talk) 01:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not notable per available sources. Name is shared with notable people and that does not make it easy to do research. However, if he was an important tv personality I'd expect there to be a detailed IMDb profile. More likely gave some professional commentary. In a worse case scenario he's counting commercial time. Either way not good enough. gidonb ( talk) 01:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.