The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
delete Given that there's no claim to notability, I see no reason to keep what is evidently an ordinary if rather windy rural road.
Mangoe (
talk)
00:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - A
WP:BEFORE search shows there are quite a few sources, many of which seem to provide significant coverage of this road; for example its maintenance. Somebody who is knowledgeable in the subject area could probably incorporate them into the article.
HumanBodyPiloter5 (
talk)
13:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I found such sources as
[1], but none are actually significant coverage beyond routine local news about repairs and upgrades any generic road gets. It's hardly even encyclopedic to mention such mundanity, much less notable.
Reywas92Talk15:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I cannot find anything other than the ordinary and routine for any road with this name for ~100 years. Every road gets maintenance, etc. The most interesting thing I found was
this and
this, that is, critically the name "Duckmaloi Road" has applied to two different roads in the very same area, changing on 27 March 1997, so any article/s will have to keep the two separate.
Aoziwe (
talk)
10:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - per Reywas92, fails
WP:GNG with only local and routine coverage, and doesn't seem to be a clear alternative to deletion given there are two roads with the same name and the roads pass through a number of different localities.
Deus et lex (
talk)
13:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
delete Given that there's no claim to notability, I see no reason to keep what is evidently an ordinary if rather windy rural road.
Mangoe (
talk)
00:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - A
WP:BEFORE search shows there are quite a few sources, many of which seem to provide significant coverage of this road; for example its maintenance. Somebody who is knowledgeable in the subject area could probably incorporate them into the article.
HumanBodyPiloter5 (
talk)
13:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I found such sources as
[1], but none are actually significant coverage beyond routine local news about repairs and upgrades any generic road gets. It's hardly even encyclopedic to mention such mundanity, much less notable.
Reywas92Talk15:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I cannot find anything other than the ordinary and routine for any road with this name for ~100 years. Every road gets maintenance, etc. The most interesting thing I found was
this and
this, that is, critically the name "Duckmaloi Road" has applied to two different roads in the very same area, changing on 27 March 1997, so any article/s will have to keep the two separate.
Aoziwe (
talk)
10:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - per Reywas92, fails
WP:GNG with only local and routine coverage, and doesn't seem to be a clear alternative to deletion given there are two roads with the same name and the roads pass through a number of different localities.
Deus et lex (
talk)
13:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.