From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bells Corners under WP:AVALANCHE. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 19:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Drummond Methodist Church

Drummond Methodist Church (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NBUILD. The article has some significant primary research but fails to illustrate the significance of the building or notability. Inclusion on the city protection register doesn't seem enough and, after a search online, can't see how this article could be notable as a small former local church building 59abcd ( talk) 23:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bells Corners under WP:AVALANCHE. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 19:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Drummond Methodist Church

Drummond Methodist Church (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NBUILD. The article has some significant primary research but fails to illustrate the significance of the building or notability. Inclusion on the city protection register doesn't seem enough and, after a search online, can't see how this article could be notable as a small former local church building 59abcd ( talk) 23:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook