- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Dream Station Productions
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dream Station Productions ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure how this even meets WP:NCORP. The coverage seem to be inadequate per WP:SIRS, and this page is PROMO. I strongly smell UPE. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Saqib,
- The page was approved by the admins when it was created in 2019 I guess. I don't know why you are making it a personal issue. I suggest to strongly keep. The sources are independent.
Aanuarif (
talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Aanuarif, Aanuarif, Just because a page was approved in the past doesn't mean it can't be nominated for deletion now. I'm curious which admin approved it? I would like to ask them what basis they used. The problem isn't just whether the coverage is independent or not, but it's pretty clear they don't meet the WP:SIRS. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Music. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, I cannot see how the sources in the article meet WP:NCORP. I agree with the nominator that this has strong whiffs of UPE about it. Can anyone wishing to advocate for keeping the article please share the best three links that they believe have " significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"? Daniel ( talk) 02:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Agreed with nom. Article style is highly promotional to make it look notable when it's actually not. Haruka Amaranth 14:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Dream Station Productions
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dream Station Productions ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure how this even meets WP:NCORP. The coverage seem to be inadequate per WP:SIRS, and this page is PROMO. I strongly smell UPE. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Saqib,
- The page was approved by the admins when it was created in 2019 I guess. I don't know why you are making it a personal issue. I suggest to strongly keep. The sources are independent.
Aanuarif (
talk) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Aanuarif, Aanuarif, Just because a page was approved in the past doesn't mean it can't be nominated for deletion now. I'm curious which admin approved it? I would like to ask them what basis they used. The problem isn't just whether the coverage is independent or not, but it's pretty clear they don't meet the WP:SIRS. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 10:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Music. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, I cannot see how the sources in the article meet WP:NCORP. I agree with the nominator that this has strong whiffs of UPE about it. Can anyone wishing to advocate for keeping the article please share the best three links that they believe have " significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"? Daniel ( talk) 02:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Agreed with nom. Article style is highly promotional to make it look notable when it's actually not. Haruka Amaranth 14:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.