The result was delete. Tone 16:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable political party. This is a political party which only ever fielded one candidate, who only received 200 votes out of an electorate of at least 5,000. As far as I can tell, it never received significant coverage in reliable sources; the only coverage I can find is trivial (e.g. [1]). This article was previously nominated for deletion back in 2005 and kept, on the dubious grounds that all political parties that have ever existed are automatically notable. If that was ever policy, I don't believe it is any more. Robofish ( talk) 23:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete for lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Niteshift36 ( talk) 02:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 16:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable political party. This is a political party which only ever fielded one candidate, who only received 200 votes out of an electorate of at least 5,000. As far as I can tell, it never received significant coverage in reliable sources; the only coverage I can find is trivial (e.g. [1]). This article was previously nominated for deletion back in 2005 and kept, on the dubious grounds that all political parties that have ever existed are automatically notable. If that was ever policy, I don't believe it is any more. Robofish ( talk) 23:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC) reply
*Delete for lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Niteshift36 ( talk) 02:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply