From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was wrong venue. Drafts are discussed at WP:MfD, and have different criteria than articles. AfD is not the proper place to discuss merges either. ansh 666 17:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Draft:Audi Bangladesh (  | [[Talk:Draft:Audi Bangladesh|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page when the information on that page could - and likely should - be merged into the main article about the brand. Strikerforce Talk 17:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was wrong venue. Drafts are discussed at WP:MfD, and have different criteria than articles. AfD is not the proper place to discuss merges either. ansh 666 17:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Draft:Audi Bangladesh (  | [[Talk:Draft:Audi Bangladesh|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page when the information on that page could - and likely should - be merged into the main article about the brand. Strikerforce Talk 17:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook