The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability is not established. Óðinn ☭☆ talk 23:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems to me that some clever and successful "hacking" is taking place to the benefit of Senator Murray, and to the ultimate damage of Wikipedia's reputation as a reliable information source. All of the references to Senator Murry's potential opposition seem to be effectively disabled or besmirched. I have found nothing equivalent when reviewing Democratic opponents to Republican incumbents. Is it Wikipedia's goal to allow 'contributors' or commenters to drive away half of the US population from its pages by permitting such drivel? These are postings of information about 'political' candidates, yet the commenters complain that articles are 'promoting' the candidate? Do they expect a candidate to post articles demeaning themselves or besmirching their own character. Of course not. This is a cheap way to deprive the public of information, which seems contrary to the very essence of Wikipedia.
The elimination of all bias destroys all information. The hiding of bias "in the name of fairness" is the worst form of deception.— Alkem7 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability is not established. Óðinn ☭☆ talk 23:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems to me that some clever and successful "hacking" is taking place to the benefit of Senator Murray, and to the ultimate damage of Wikipedia's reputation as a reliable information source. All of the references to Senator Murry's potential opposition seem to be effectively disabled or besmirched. I have found nothing equivalent when reviewing Democratic opponents to Republican incumbents. Is it Wikipedia's goal to allow 'contributors' or commenters to drive away half of the US population from its pages by permitting such drivel? These are postings of information about 'political' candidates, yet the commenters complain that articles are 'promoting' the candidate? Do they expect a candidate to post articles demeaning themselves or besmirching their own character. Of course not. This is a cheap way to deprive the public of information, which seems contrary to the very essence of Wikipedia.
The elimination of all bias destroys all information. The hiding of bias "in the name of fairness" is the worst form of deception.— Alkem7 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.