The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. The most cited papers are 105, 82, 35, 5, 3 ... in google Scholar [1] ; in medicine, a very high citation-density field, this is not enough for notability. The standard of notability is science is world-wide, not merely being important in the context of a particular country. The low citation figures are despite much of the work being published in international journals, so I don;tthink this is the result of the publication bias that can be relevant to people in some subjects where publication is only in less-available national journals. The Quranic work is harder to judge, but it is apparently self-published. DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. The most cited papers are 105, 82, 35, 5, 3 ... in google Scholar [1] ; in medicine, a very high citation-density field, this is not enough for notability. The standard of notability is science is world-wide, not merely being important in the context of a particular country. The low citation figures are despite much of the work being published in international journals, so I don;tthink this is the result of the publication bias that can be relevant to people in some subjects where publication is only in less-available national journals. The Quranic work is harder to judge, but it is apparently self-published. DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)