The result was delete. While the company has plenty of indicators of its importance, proper sourcing has not been provided to establish its notability. lifebaka ++ 15:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC) reply
This software company appears to be non-notable.
A number of external references are currently provided in the article, but none of them attest to notability:
I initially came to this article when I saw it in the speedy deletion list; I recognized the name since I am a very happy Dovico user at work. However when I tried to find significant, independent coverage in reliable sources to add to the article, all I could come up with was press releases and a few forum posts.
I therefore believe that Dovico (company) does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:ORG, and that the article should be deleted. Thparkth ( talk) 13:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC) reply
A Google News Archive search returns tangential coverage and press releases.
I agree with the analyses of Thparkth ( talk · contribs) and Pnm ( talk · contribs) and concur that Dovico does not pass Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (companies). Cunard ( talk) 22:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. While the company has plenty of indicators of its importance, proper sourcing has not been provided to establish its notability. lifebaka ++ 15:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC) reply
This software company appears to be non-notable.
A number of external references are currently provided in the article, but none of them attest to notability:
I initially came to this article when I saw it in the speedy deletion list; I recognized the name since I am a very happy Dovico user at work. However when I tried to find significant, independent coverage in reliable sources to add to the article, all I could come up with was press releases and a few forum posts.
I therefore believe that Dovico (company) does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:ORG, and that the article should be deleted. Thparkth ( talk) 13:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC) reply
A Google News Archive search returns tangential coverage and press releases.
I agree with the analyses of Thparkth ( talk · contribs) and Pnm ( talk · contribs) and concur that Dovico does not pass Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (companies). Cunard ( talk) 22:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC) reply