The result was no consensus. Even after relisting, the consensus is unclear at best. Almost as many wish to retain in some format or another, either through outright keep or merge, as favor deletion - and secondary sources have been provided and recommended during the course of the AFD. It is indeed possible that a merge outcome might be the best idea, but that could be something to discuss in more depth and at more length, over a greater extended period of time than a simple AFD, at the talk page of the article in question. -- Cirt ( talk) 08:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced website article that does not claim notability. But the article has been around since 2006, so I'm bringing it to AFD instead of speedy deleting it per A7. A Google search indicates that the website may be notable. Sandstein 21:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Even after relisting, the consensus is unclear at best. Almost as many wish to retain in some format or another, either through outright keep or merge, as favor deletion - and secondary sources have been provided and recommended during the course of the AFD. It is indeed possible that a merge outcome might be the best idea, but that could be something to discuss in more depth and at more length, over a greater extended period of time than a simple AFD, at the talk page of the article in question. -- Cirt ( talk) 08:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced website article that does not claim notability. But the article has been around since 2006, so I'm bringing it to AFD instead of speedy deleting it per A7. A Google search indicates that the website may be notable. Sandstein 21:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply