From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But without prejudice to undeletion for the purpose of merging into a broader list of Trump products, if any such article is created. Sandstein 10:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Donald J. Trump Signature Collection (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct clothing line, whose notability is not asserted independently of its association with Donald Trump, therefore fails WP:PRODUCT.

A large section of the article is dedicated to a 2011 lawsuit, which could be briefly mentioned in Legal affairs of Donald Trump, as that article is currently silent on this particular case.

The rest covers marketing of the 2004 product launch, and campaign fodder from 2015/2016. This last bit may go into Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016, if it's not already there. That article now says that in 2015 Macy's announced it would phase out its Trump-branded merchandise over Trump's comments about Mexicans, which seems a sufficient summary of what there is to know in relation to this brand. — JFG talk 00:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply

See also the recent deletion of "Trump fragrances" along the same lines. — JFG talk 01:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. J947 Public ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. J947 Public ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep- It was a well-known product line (even before Trump launched his campaign). The fact that you are suggesting the the content of the article be split and added into two separate articles supports it notability. A reader should not have to go to two different articles to learn about one topic.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 00:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
I am only suggesting to salvage a couple of sentences, especially to avoid losing information about a business lawsuit that received some press coverage. That does not make the product line independently notable. — JFG talk 01:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. J 947 ( c · m) 03:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Why don't we just have an article on Donald Trump products into which we can smerge all this stuff? It's not like we tend to have individual articles for each of the enterprise-branded products of any celebrity. bd2412 T 00:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
This seems like the best idea to me. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 10:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Trump puts his name on lots of prodcuts. There are ways to cover his business endevors besides little articles on each of his attempts to increase name recognition and profit. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- a nn product line; the controversies appear to be minor. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or all celebrity-branded products. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But without prejudice to undeletion for the purpose of merging into a broader list of Trump products, if any such article is created. Sandstein 10:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Donald J. Trump Signature Collection (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct clothing line, whose notability is not asserted independently of its association with Donald Trump, therefore fails WP:PRODUCT.

A large section of the article is dedicated to a 2011 lawsuit, which could be briefly mentioned in Legal affairs of Donald Trump, as that article is currently silent on this particular case.

The rest covers marketing of the 2004 product launch, and campaign fodder from 2015/2016. This last bit may go into Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016, if it's not already there. That article now says that in 2015 Macy's announced it would phase out its Trump-branded merchandise over Trump's comments about Mexicans, which seems a sufficient summary of what there is to know in relation to this brand. — JFG talk 00:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply

See also the recent deletion of "Trump fragrances" along the same lines. — JFG talk 01:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. J947 Public ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. J947 Public ( talk) 00:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep- It was a well-known product line (even before Trump launched his campaign). The fact that you are suggesting the the content of the article be split and added into two separate articles supports it notability. A reader should not have to go to two different articles to learn about one topic.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 00:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
I am only suggesting to salvage a couple of sentences, especially to avoid losing information about a business lawsuit that received some press coverage. That does not make the product line independently notable. — JFG talk 01:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. J 947 ( c · m) 03:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Why don't we just have an article on Donald Trump products into which we can smerge all this stuff? It's not like we tend to have individual articles for each of the enterprise-branded products of any celebrity. bd2412 T 00:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
This seems like the best idea to me. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 10:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Trump puts his name on lots of prodcuts. There are ways to cover his business endevors besides little articles on each of his attempts to increase name recognition and profit. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- a nn product line; the controversies appear to be minor. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or all celebrity-branded products. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook