- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus that the topic fails WP:GNG. Being interesting, sadly,is not a valid ground for keeping. At a minimum, where an article is badly sourced, we need some evidence that sources are likely to be out there. Just Chilling ( talk) 12:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Domino (car) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only references are to defunct Facebook pages. Not obviously notable and rather a lot of futurology. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no sources or notability MaskedSinger ( talk) 20:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Again, nothing comes up in Google, and it's quite clear that this fails WP:GNG. William2001( talk) 21:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also, Facebook references? I think Facebook is not a good reference even if the page is not defunct. William2001( talk) 21:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As a petrolhead I find this article interesting, I have never heard about these guys. Lack of links is not a reason for removal, lots of old/rare stuff is never mentioned on the Web. Mikus ( talk) 21:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Given the age of the company and per Mikus' concerns, this very well could be a notable topic with plentiful offline references, e.g. book on minis. Would be helpful for a petrolhead with a petrollibrary to participate? Pegnawl ( talk) 15:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'm happy to be convinced that its notable. But all articles need references - and they needn't be online. Rathfelder ( talk) 18:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk ( talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk ( talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability. Failure to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 16:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus that the topic fails WP:GNG. Being interesting, sadly,is not a valid ground for keeping. At a minimum, where an article is badly sourced, we need some evidence that sources are likely to be out there. Just Chilling ( talk) 12:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Domino (car) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only references are to defunct Facebook pages. Not obviously notable and rather a lot of futurology. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no sources or notability MaskedSinger ( talk) 20:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Again, nothing comes up in Google, and it's quite clear that this fails WP:GNG. William2001( talk) 21:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also, Facebook references? I think Facebook is not a good reference even if the page is not defunct. William2001( talk) 21:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As a petrolhead I find this article interesting, I have never heard about these guys. Lack of links is not a reason for removal, lots of old/rare stuff is never mentioned on the Web. Mikus ( talk) 21:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Given the age of the company and per Mikus' concerns, this very well could be a notable topic with plentiful offline references, e.g. book on minis. Would be helpful for a petrolhead with a petrollibrary to participate? Pegnawl ( talk) 15:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'm happy to be convinced that its notable. But all articles need references - and they needn't be online. Rathfelder ( talk) 18:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk ( talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk ( talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability. Failure to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 16:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.