The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy DeleteZsinjTalk 02:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete even if this isn't nonsense, it's still a violation of
WP:OR.Shindo9Hikaru 01:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment I believe it to be nonsense because the article ends with 'no logic behind it.' That makes the article incoherent, as far as I am concerned.
the_undertowtalk 01:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy DeleteZsinjTalk 02:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete even if this isn't nonsense, it's still a violation of
WP:OR.Shindo9Hikaru 01:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment I believe it to be nonsense because the article ends with 'no logic behind it.' That makes the article incoherent, as far as I am concerned.
the_undertowtalk 01:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.