The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 04:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No WP:SIGCOV could be found; fails WP:GNG. Appears to lack legal recognition, fails WP:GEOLAND.
Standalone article not warranted under WP:PAGEDECIDE; duplicates content at Petrich Municipality. I propose redirecting to that article. BilledMammal ( talk) 17:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
What indicates it lacks legal recognition?We don't have a source showing that it has legal recognition - and even if we did, WP:GEOLAND only grants a presumption of notability, not a guarantee of it, and WP:PAGEDECIDE can mean we shouldn't have an article even if the topic is notable. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
duplicates content at Petrich Municipality: that was true for only a few hours yesterday, and only because you had just coped that content there [1]. – Uanfala ( talk) 11:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The source you have provided is a census report: this is incorrect.
[I]f you want to restore yours please remove the information from both articles: I would love to be able to update all village articles in this province, but I don't have the time. And I don't think my improvement in one article should be made conditional on making the same improvement in another. – Uanfala ( talk) 11:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
this is incorrectIt is from the national statistics units, and is a register of populations. I believe I am incorrect about it being from the census - it is from 2003, and there was no census conducted in that year - but it still appears to be statistical information and not an indication of legal recognition.
And I don't think my improvement in one article should be made conditional on making the same improvement in another.It isn't. But you cannot use your failure to argue that because Dolene contains the information that you removed as unreliable from Petrich Municipality it cannot be deleted under WP:PAGEDECIDE. BilledMammal ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 04:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No WP:SIGCOV could be found; fails WP:GNG. Appears to lack legal recognition, fails WP:GEOLAND.
Standalone article not warranted under WP:PAGEDECIDE; duplicates content at Petrich Municipality. I propose redirecting to that article. BilledMammal ( talk) 17:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
What indicates it lacks legal recognition?We don't have a source showing that it has legal recognition - and even if we did, WP:GEOLAND only grants a presumption of notability, not a guarantee of it, and WP:PAGEDECIDE can mean we shouldn't have an article even if the topic is notable. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
duplicates content at Petrich Municipality: that was true for only a few hours yesterday, and only because you had just coped that content there [1]. – Uanfala ( talk) 11:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The source you have provided is a census report: this is incorrect.
[I]f you want to restore yours please remove the information from both articles: I would love to be able to update all village articles in this province, but I don't have the time. And I don't think my improvement in one article should be made conditional on making the same improvement in another. – Uanfala ( talk) 11:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
this is incorrectIt is from the national statistics units, and is a register of populations. I believe I am incorrect about it being from the census - it is from 2003, and there was no census conducted in that year - but it still appears to be statistical information and not an indication of legal recognition.
And I don't think my improvement in one article should be made conditional on making the same improvement in another.It isn't. But you cannot use your failure to argue that because Dolene contains the information that you removed as unreliable from Petrich Municipality it cannot be deleted under WP:PAGEDECIDE. BilledMammal ( talk) 12:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)