The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
Google for "Dodge B110" -wikipedia yields a mere 76 results. Essentially no info, just a stub. If it could be expanded with lots of useful info, I'd say keep it, but it seems like just another stub from here. deleteMalo05:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep - seems to be a legit model, and has potential for expansion if any users know about this one (when and where produced, features, etc).
CLW10:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete unless independently (non-wikipedia) verified and notability established. The search results I found were mostly Wikipedia mirrors. Keep if it is a legitimate, significant model. --
Kjkolb00:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a
Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
Google for "Dodge B110" -wikipedia yields a mere 76 results. Essentially no info, just a stub. If it could be expanded with lots of useful info, I'd say keep it, but it seems like just another stub from here. deleteMalo05:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Keep - seems to be a legit model, and has potential for expansion if any users know about this one (when and where produced, features, etc).
CLW10:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete unless independently (non-wikipedia) verified and notability established. The search results I found were mostly Wikipedia mirrors. Keep if it is a legitimate, significant model. --
Kjkolb00:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.