The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Flowerparty■ 02:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment I've fixed the IMDB link. It may be notable but I cannot think of a good encyclopedic reason for this article. Is it ever going to be more than what is already in IMDB?
kotepho 21:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete whata nice article. I agree "This article serves no real intellectual purpose" --
MaNeMeBasat 07:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete.
Flowerparty■ 02:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment I've fixed the IMDB link. It may be notable but I cannot think of a good encyclopedic reason for this article. Is it ever going to be more than what is already in IMDB?
kotepho 21:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete whata nice article. I agree "This article serves no real intellectual purpose" --
MaNeMeBasat 07:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.