The result was keep. No consensus to delete, and a consensus that the subject is independently notable; concerns on how this article is integrated with the broader series can be handled outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 20:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Delete per WP:GNG - the topic did not receive extensive coverage that warrants an independent article. The article is made up of information taken from the main series page at RuPaul's_Drag_Race_All_Stars_(season_3)#Episodes. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
if they're unlikely to grow beyond stubs they probably shouldn't existapplies. List of RuPaul's Drag Race episodes doesn't include episode descriptions at all, and RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 3)#Episodes includes much less episode-specific content than this article. Plenty of FA-class articles average fewer than 25 views a day (e.g. here and here and here), so that's not an indicator of the subject's value to the encyclopedia. I bet the page views would go up if we just linked to this article from the bodies of some other articles (e.g. contestants who participated)—right now, most of what links to it is just from the navbox. Armadillopteryx talk 09:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
most people don't know the names of the episodes that that the page views clearly show its not a viable search term– there are lots of reasons page views could be low, some of which I mentioned above; not sure how you've decided the reason is so obviously the one you state. Or why you don't apply the same assumption to all articles with low page views, including obviously notable subjects like the many FAs that fall into that category.
I want the content to reach as many readers as possible– as I and Gleeanon409 have mentioned, the way to get the most content to readers would be to expand and link this article from the body of more prominent pages, such as the season page and contestant pages. Deleting and/or trimming gets less content to people, not more.
The result was keep. No consensus to delete, and a consensus that the subject is independently notable; concerns on how this article is integrated with the broader series can be handled outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 20:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Delete per WP:GNG - the topic did not receive extensive coverage that warrants an independent article. The article is made up of information taken from the main series page at RuPaul's_Drag_Race_All_Stars_(season_3)#Episodes. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
if they're unlikely to grow beyond stubs they probably shouldn't existapplies. List of RuPaul's Drag Race episodes doesn't include episode descriptions at all, and RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 3)#Episodes includes much less episode-specific content than this article. Plenty of FA-class articles average fewer than 25 views a day (e.g. here and here and here), so that's not an indicator of the subject's value to the encyclopedia. I bet the page views would go up if we just linked to this article from the bodies of some other articles (e.g. contestants who participated)—right now, most of what links to it is just from the navbox. Armadillopteryx talk 09:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
most people don't know the names of the episodes that that the page views clearly show its not a viable search term– there are lots of reasons page views could be low, some of which I mentioned above; not sure how you've decided the reason is so obviously the one you state. Or why you don't apply the same assumption to all articles with low page views, including obviously notable subjects like the many FAs that fall into that category.
I want the content to reach as many readers as possible– as I and Gleeanon409 have mentioned, the way to get the most content to readers would be to expand and link this article from the body of more prominent pages, such as the season page and contestant pages. Deleting and/or trimming gets less content to people, not more.