- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. / Withdrawn - Shit my apologies I had searched "Disney Channel (India)" which only brought up mentions however bizarrely "Disney Channel India" brings up substantial stuff, Broadcast is irrelevant but anywho withdrawing. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Disney Channel (India) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable TV channel, No evidence of notability, Could probably be merged or redirected to The Walt Disney Company (India) however I'll let the community decide, Anyway fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 18:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep National cable channels are presumed notable per WP:BROADCAST and it does not fail GNG. A click on the news link above reveals sufficient coverage, including but not limited to this Hollywood Reporter story from last year. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- TV channels are treated like any other article which is if there's no evidence of notability then they either get redirected (which I have no issue with) or they're deleted, Unfortunately the article so far does fail GNG however if you can find substantial sources then I'd be more than happy to withdraw, Thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 23:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- "if you can find substantial sources?" Well, I just listed one. And you have looked at the other Gnews results by clicking on the "news" link above, right? And you have read WP:BROADCAST and its provisions for national cable networks? If you've done your BEFORE work, looked at the news coverage and read the policy and don't come to the same conclusion as me, fine. I'm not concerned about you withdrawing this. Shawn in Montreal ( talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. / Withdrawn - Shit my apologies I had searched "Disney Channel (India)" which only brought up mentions however bizarrely "Disney Channel India" brings up substantial stuff, Broadcast is irrelevant but anywho withdrawing. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Disney Channel (India) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable TV channel, No evidence of notability, Could probably be merged or redirected to The Walt Disney Company (India) however I'll let the community decide, Anyway fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 18:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep National cable channels are presumed notable per WP:BROADCAST and it does not fail GNG. A click on the news link above reveals sufficient coverage, including but not limited to this Hollywood Reporter story from last year. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- TV channels are treated like any other article which is if there's no evidence of notability then they either get redirected (which I have no issue with) or they're deleted, Unfortunately the article so far does fail GNG however if you can find substantial sources then I'd be more than happy to withdraw, Thanks, – Davey2010 Talk 23:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- "if you can find substantial sources?" Well, I just listed one. And you have looked at the other Gnews results by clicking on the "news" link above, right? And you have read WP:BROADCAST and its provisions for national cable networks? If you've done your BEFORE work, looked at the news coverage and read the policy and don't come to the same conclusion as me, fine. I'm not concerned about you withdrawing this. Shawn in Montreal ( talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.