The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 01:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete - Lifehacker external link is borderline reliable, and a search revealed similar brief review and download sites, but no significant RS coverage. Also, created by an
SPA as possibly promotional.
Dialectric (
talk) 19:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 01:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete - Lifehacker external link is borderline reliable, and a search revealed similar brief review and download sites, but no significant RS coverage. Also, created by an
SPA as possibly promotional.
Dialectric (
talk) 19:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.