- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Disappearance of Dannette and Jeannette Millbrook
- Disappearance of Dannette and Jeannette Millbrook ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no general significance DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete nothing about this case differentiates it enough to show true notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - national+ coverage some 30 years later as can ben seen in gNews. Coverage is diverse, and comes in a few spurts. Icewhiz ( talk) 06:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Ongoing coverage after many, many years suggests passing WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 09:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 10:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - still ongoing coverage. Per WP:GNG. Good sourcing.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 11:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as passing the GNG. Bold lead should be tweaked to reflect the title. gidonb ( talk) 01:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Disappearance of Dannette and Jeannette Millbrook
- Disappearance of Dannette and Jeannette Millbrook ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no general significance DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete nothing about this case differentiates it enough to show true notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 06:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - national+ coverage some 30 years later as can ben seen in gNews. Coverage is diverse, and comes in a few spurts. Icewhiz ( talk) 06:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Ongoing coverage after many, many years suggests passing WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 09:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 10:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - still ongoing coverage. Per WP:GNG. Good sourcing.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 11:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as passing the GNG. Bold lead should be tweaked to reflect the title. gidonb ( talk) 01:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.