From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As mentioned in discussion below, the subject passes notability guidelines for politicians. A subject doesnt have to pass general notability criteria if it passes subject-specific notability guidelines. Hence as long as it can be verified in reliable sources that the subject is/was member of legislative assembly, the subject doesnt need to have significant coverage. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Dinesh Parmar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. No credible citations are available. Calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep - a minister in the state cabinet and a member of a state legislature easily passes WP:NPOL. WP:NPOL states that "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. ..." (my emphasis) -- Soman ( talk) 11:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Kindly note, it fails WP:SIGCOV i.e., no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. If you can help, then please update the article. - Hatchens ( talk) 03:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. As mentioned in discussion below, the subject passes notability guidelines for politicians. A subject doesnt have to pass general notability criteria if it passes subject-specific notability guidelines. Hence as long as it can be verified in reliable sources that the subject is/was member of legislative assembly, the subject doesnt need to have significant coverage. —usernamekiran (talk) 08:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Dinesh Parmar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. No credible citations are available. Calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 04:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep - a minister in the state cabinet and a member of a state legislature easily passes WP:NPOL. WP:NPOL states that "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. ..." (my emphasis) -- Soman ( talk) 11:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Kindly note, it fails WP:SIGCOV i.e., no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. If you can help, then please update the article. - Hatchens ( talk) 03:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook