- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Diane Yatauro
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Diane Yatauro ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously kept in the yonder-years of 2009. However, our notability threshold has stiffened since then. New York county legislators are not an WP:NPOL-awarding position. While there is some coverage on newspapers.com, it is entirely run-of-the-mill coverage from local news ( example) with no indication of any broader WP:SIGCOV, so this does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 01:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and New York. Curbon7 ( talk) 01:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete agree, local politicians aren't notable unless they have substantial coverage. I don't see anything extra beyond mentions as explained, in local newspapers.
Oaktree b (
talk)
03:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is about the only mention in non-local news, and it's trivial coverage [1] in the New York Times. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, previously at AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)- Delete: Lacks any significant coverage, until anything more substantial can be found, should be deleted until then. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 01:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Diane Yatauro
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Diane Yatauro ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously kept in the yonder-years of 2009. However, our notability threshold has stiffened since then. New York county legislators are not an WP:NPOL-awarding position. While there is some coverage on newspapers.com, it is entirely run-of-the-mill coverage from local news ( example) with no indication of any broader WP:SIGCOV, so this does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 01:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and New York. Curbon7 ( talk) 01:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete agree, local politicians aren't notable unless they have substantial coverage. I don't see anything extra beyond mentions as explained, in local newspapers.
Oaktree b (
talk)
03:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is about the only mention in non-local news, and it's trivial coverage [1] in the New York Times. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, previously at AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)- Delete: Lacks any significant coverage, until anything more substantial can be found, should be deleted until then. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 01:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.