From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 21:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Dfinity (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCRYPTO and WP:NCORP only coverage seems to be about fundraisers, lacks depth. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete all sources are about funding announcements and the like. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC) reply
The reason for considering this article for deletion is in the deletion statement at the top of this discussion. The only place to discuss the article subject is on its talk page but that page is for discussing improvements to the article, it's not a discussion forum. This discussion is the place to discuss whether or not the article should be deleted based on Wikipedia policy-based reasons. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Borderline delete - coverage in three RSes, which is good for a crypto thing - but when you look it's funding rounds and WP:CRYSTAL. That's not really enough to pass WP:NCORP. A bit of a REFBOMB of passing mentions and yellow-rated sources that can't be used for notability, like TechCrunch. This isn't there yet - David Gerard ( talk) 20:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Borderline delete, Agree with David Gerard, these sources feel like the best of the bunch to me. [1] [2] [3] [4] From my understand of the guidelines listed above, I do not feel that these sources establish notability. You play to win the game ( talk) 23:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "EIN COMPUTER FÜR ALLE" [ONE COMPUTER FOR ALL]. Forbes (in German). Retrieved 2022-03-23.
  2. ^ Williams-Grut, Oscar (2018-02-07). "Andreessen Horowitz is backing a crypto-powered 'internet computer' that could be the future of cloud computing". Business Insider. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  3. ^ "Internet Computer Token Still Gains Developers, Users After Market Cap Tumble". Bloomberg.com. 2021-07-28. Retrieved 2022-08-27.
  4. ^ Livni, Ephrat; Sorkin, Andrew Ross (2021-06-28). "The Dramatic Crash of a Buzzy Cryptocurrency Raises Eyebrows". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 21:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Dfinity (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCRYPTO and WP:NCORP only coverage seems to be about fundraisers, lacks depth. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete all sources are about funding announcements and the like. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC) reply
The reason for considering this article for deletion is in the deletion statement at the top of this discussion. The only place to discuss the article subject is on its talk page but that page is for discussing improvements to the article, it's not a discussion forum. This discussion is the place to discuss whether or not the article should be deleted based on Wikipedia policy-based reasons. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Borderline delete - coverage in three RSes, which is good for a crypto thing - but when you look it's funding rounds and WP:CRYSTAL. That's not really enough to pass WP:NCORP. A bit of a REFBOMB of passing mentions and yellow-rated sources that can't be used for notability, like TechCrunch. This isn't there yet - David Gerard ( talk) 20:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Borderline delete, Agree with David Gerard, these sources feel like the best of the bunch to me. [1] [2] [3] [4] From my understand of the guidelines listed above, I do not feel that these sources establish notability. You play to win the game ( talk) 23:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "EIN COMPUTER FÜR ALLE" [ONE COMPUTER FOR ALL]. Forbes (in German). Retrieved 2022-03-23.
  2. ^ Williams-Grut, Oscar (2018-02-07). "Andreessen Horowitz is backing a crypto-powered 'internet computer' that could be the future of cloud computing". Business Insider. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  3. ^ "Internet Computer Token Still Gains Developers, Users After Market Cap Tumble". Bloomberg.com. 2021-07-28. Retrieved 2022-08-27.
  4. ^ Livni, Ephrat; Sorkin, Andrew Ross (2021-06-28). "The Dramatic Crash of a Buzzy Cryptocurrency Raises Eyebrows". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook