- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to nationalization. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Deprivatization
- Deprivatization ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was a redirect to Nationalization for about five years. Then an IP created this unreferenced article that is little more than a definition with an edit comment that the redirect was "improper". The lead does say that Deprivatization is also called Renationalization (which is covered in Nationalization). I don't see anything improper about redirecting to a much better article. This article should be deleted/with the original redirect restored. MB 04:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to nationalization. As pointed out, renationalization is talked about at nationalization. The current article offers it as a synonym for deprivatization. I found some usage of the term deprivatization but again, for the same concept as renationalization. Mr. Magoo ( talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 03:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to nationalization. This is a classic case of Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 07:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect and prevent further re-creation. Bearian ( talk) 14:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to nationalization. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Deprivatization
- Deprivatization ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was a redirect to Nationalization for about five years. Then an IP created this unreferenced article that is little more than a definition with an edit comment that the redirect was "improper". The lead does say that Deprivatization is also called Renationalization (which is covered in Nationalization). I don't see anything improper about redirecting to a much better article. This article should be deleted/with the original redirect restored. MB 04:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to nationalization. As pointed out, renationalization is talked about at nationalization. The current article offers it as a synonym for deprivatization. I found some usage of the term deprivatization but again, for the same concept as renationalization. Mr. Magoo ( talk) 22:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 03:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to nationalization. This is a classic case of Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 07:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect and prevent further re-creation. Bearian ( talk) 14:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.